By Richard Knox
For more than 50 years, most of what doctors know about which cancer treatments work and which ones don’t has come out of a big federally funded network of far-flung academic researchers known obscurely as the Cooperative Group Program.
That program is now “at a breaking point,” says Dr. John Mendelsohn of the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. “The program urgently needs changes across the board.”
Mendelsohn chairs a group of 17 experts convened by the National Institute of Medicine to diagnose the Cooperative Group’s ills, and they found many.
The report they released today says lives will be lost and money wasted if the Cooperative Group isn’t overhauled quickly.
For starters, the panel says, the program is starved for funds.The experts say that budget needs to double by 2015.
The current Cooperative Group budget is $250 million a year — less than three percent of the National Cancer Institute’s annual budget — to do studies involving 25,000 cancer patients a year.
Part of the money would boost funding for academic researchers, who are underpaid for the time they spend on clinical trials, the IOM panel says. Academic institutions are uniquely suited to this work because they value the kind of basic (non-human) research and patient care the Cooperative Group needs.
Many of the questions studied by the Cooperative Group are not likely to be tackled by pharma or biotech companies, the IOM panel says. Commercial firms are mainly interested in studies that will get their drugs approved, not in research that compares, say, different combinations of drugs.
Patients often have disincentives to sign up for clinical trials too. Health insurers, including government programs, should pay for the clinical care they need when they’re enrolled in a study, the IOM committee says.
The panel also says it takes too long — two years on average — for the Cooperative Group to design, approve and launch a study. By the time a trial gets underway, the questions it was designed to answer are often outdated. That does no service to cancer patients who volunteer for clinical trials, and it wastes money too.
» E-Mail This » Add to Del.icio.us
Popularity: unranked [?]
Related Posts
- “Nearly One in Four Americans Will Die of Cancer” (NYT)–Unless You Are a Woman, a Non-Smoker, Middle-Class or over 35 . . .
Summary-Not long ago, a New York Times editorial repeated a statistic that you may have heard before: "one in four Americans are projected to die of cancer." Fortun... - Lung Cancer Screening Often Raises False Alarm
By Richard Knox
Somewhere north of 90 million Americans are at risk of lung cancer because they're current or former smokers. Many are tempted to get a CT lung scan, costing $300 ... - Early Research Points To Improved Lung Cancer Care
By Scott Hensley
When a doctor diagnoses cancer, the labels for the disease are awfully broad, a fact that hinders treatment.
Cancer, fundamentally, is a disease marked by speci... - Making the Case for Healthier Hearts in the Developing World
This is a joint post with Katherine Douglas.
I’d be willing to bet that nary a H8 meeting (if you have to ask….) has included a discussion on the impact of heart disease, obesity, ... - Fruits and Veggies Prevent Cancer? Not So Much, It Turns Out
Keep on eating these for your heart, just don't expect cancer-prevention miracles. (<span class="credit"iStockphoto.com)
<!--
Keep on eating these, b... - Md. insurance commissioner exploring issues with medical loss ratio
By Bob Graham - Maryland’s acting insurance commissioner says the process to resolve medical loss ratio for health insurers is in the “very early” stages. Maryland and other states... - Cheap Health Insurance :Cancer Scares nothing new
Article Summary:
This is an Health Insurance Blog designed to help the consumer navigate the often difficult process of purchasing health insurance. It also provides detailed infor... - As Consumer Group Slams Health Plans’ Profits, Insurers Point Finger Elsewhere
by Julie Rovner
... - Leave of absence
When I was applying for a new state medical license a while back, there was a page in the application where it asked me what horrible things I had done. Have you ever had criminal ... - DHCFP Reports, You Pay Attention. Part One of Two: Reserves
Two groundbreaking DHCFP reports issued today and yesterday will have a direct impact on health policy in Massachusetts.
The reports (Study of the Reserves and Surpluses of Health... - Sebelius To States: Check Health Insurers’ Rate Math
By Scott Hensley
California looks to be leading the nation again. This time the state is at the forefront of catching insurers' rate errors.
Health and Human Services Secre... - Imaging Costs Soar for Medicare Cancer Patients
Title: Imaging Costs Soar for Medicare Cancer PatientsCategory: Health NewsCreated: 4/27/2010 4:10:00 PMLast Editorial Review: 4/28/2010... - Salt in the (internal) wound
How many of your patients know how much salt is there in an Oreo cookie? Probably a lot more than you or they might think. Three cookies give you fully 11% of your daily recomm... - Cancer Patients’ Dilemma: Expensive Pills Vs. Invasive Chemo Treatment
Good story in a collaboration between Kaiser Health News and the Washington Post.
...